1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116# NeuroLink Architecture Reference for Refactoring
This document serves as a reference for the architectural analysis that was conducted to support the TypeScript compliance refactoring effort.
## Architectural Analysis Summary
The NeuroLink codebase has been comprehensively analyzed to understand its modular structure and identify areas requiring TypeScript compliance improvements. This analysis informed the creation of detailed refactor plans in the `todos/refactor/` directory.
## Key Architectural Insights
### Module Structure
The codebase consists of 10 primary modules:
1. **Core Module** - Factory patterns, base classes, analytics
2. **Providers Module** - 12+ AI provider implementations
3. **CLI Module** - Professional command-line interface
4. **MCP Module** - Model Context Protocol integration
5. **Configuration Module** - Enterprise config management
6. **Types Module** - Comprehensive type definitions
7. **Utilities Module** - Shared utility functions
8. **Test Infrastructure** - Testing framework and patterns
9. **Build System** - 7-phase enterprise build pipeline
10. **Documentation** - Comprehensive project documentation
### TypeScript Compliance Issues Identified
#### Global Issues
- **Import Extensions**: ~140 TypeScript files using `.js` extensions
- **Any Usage**: Multiple instances of `as any` in test files
- **Interface vs Types**: Inconsistent usage patterns
#### Module-Specific Issues
- **Core Module**: Factory pattern needs stricter typing
- **Providers**: Provider interfaces need consistency
- **CLI**: Command type definitions need refinement
- **MCP**: Tool registration requires type safety
- **Config**: Configuration validation needs enhancement
- **Types**: Type system needs consolidation
- **Utils**: Utility functions need proper typing
- **Tests**: Test assertions using `as any` extensively
### Refactor Plan Organization
The architectural analysis resulted in 10 detailed refactor plans:
1. **01-global-imports.md** - Fix .js extensions globally
2. **02-core-module.md** - Core factory and type improvements
3. **03-providers-module.md** - Provider interface standardization
4. **04-cli-module.md** - CLI command type safety
5. **05-mcp-module.md** - MCP tool registration typing
6. **06-config-module.md** - Configuration system enhancement
7. **07-types-module.md** - Type system consolidation
8. **08-utils-module.md** - Utility function improvements
9. **09-test-infrastructure.md** - Test type safety
10. **10-build-configuration.md** - Build pipeline optimization
### Implementation Strategy
#### Phase-Based Approach
- **Phase 1**: Global import fixes (foundational)
- **Phase 2**: Core module (enables other modules)
- **Phase 3**: Providers and CLI (parallel implementation)
- **Phase 4**: Supporting modules (MCP, Config, Types, Utils)
- **Phase 5**: Test infrastructure improvements
- **Phase 6**: Build system optimization
#### Dependencies
- All modules depend on global import fixes
- Providers and CLI depend on core module completion
- Test infrastructure depends on all module refactors
- Build optimization should be last
### Success Criteria
The refactoring effort aims to achieve:
- Zero `.js` extensions in TypeScript imports
- Elimination of `as any` usage (except where absolutely necessary)
- Consistent interface vs type usage (prefer types)
- Comprehensive type coverage across all modules
- Enhanced build pipeline with strict TypeScript validation
### Agent Consumption Guidelines
Each refactor plan in `todos/refactor/` is designed for:
- **Self-contained execution** - All necessary information included
- **Step-by-step implementation** - Exact code changes specified
- **Validation procedures** - Clear success criteria and testing steps
- **Rollback capabilities** - Safety mechanisms for failed attempts
### Reference for Implementation
This architectural analysis serves as the foundation for understanding:
- Why specific refactoring approaches were chosen
- How modules interact and depend on each other
- What the expected outcomes should be
- How to validate successful implementation
## Usage
This document should be referenced when:
- Understanding the scope of the refactoring effort
- Making decisions about implementation order
- Validating that refactor plans align with architectural goals
- Ensuring comprehensive coverage of all system components
The actual implementation instructions are contained in the individual refactor plan files in `todos/refactor/`.